Family Medicine Board Review · Hematology/Vascular · Case-Based · AAFP 2025

Venous Thromboembolism: DVT & PE

Pretest probability tools, D-dimer cutoffs, imaging algorithms, pregnancy-specific pathways, outpatient-vs-inpatient PE risk stratification, and the full anticoagulation selection/duration framework.

Why VTE Matters Pathophysiology Risk Factors DVT Diagnostic Approach D-Dimer DVT Imaging DVT Cases PE Diagnostic Approach PE Imaging PE Cases VTE in Pregnancy Inpatient vs Outpatient Treatment Phases Anticoagulant Selection Special Populations Take-Home Messages

Why VTE Matters

Board trap / classic vignette: a patient who collapses suddenly and dies with no prior history — massive PE should always be on the differential for sudden unexplained death, since it can be the very first presentation.

Pathophysiology — Virchow's Triad

1. Venous Stasis
Immobilization, surgery, long travel
2. Endothelial Injury
Trauma, surgery, central venous catheters
3. Hypercoagulability
Inherited: Factor V Leiden, prothrombin mutation
Acquired: cancer, pregnancy, estrogen, antiphospholipid syndrome
Pearl: every VTE risk factor maps onto one (or more) of these three pillars — a useful mental framework for classifying any new risk factor a vignette throws at you.

Risk Factors for VTE (By Odds Ratio)

Strong (OR >10)

Fracture (hip or leg)

Hip or knee replacement

Major general surgery

Major trauma

Spinal cord injury

Moderate (OR 2–9)

Arthroscopic knee surgery

Central venous lines

Chemotherapy

CHF or respiratory failure

Hormone replacement therapy

Malignancy

Oral contraceptive therapy

Paralytic stroke

Pregnancy/postpartum

Previous VTE

Thrombophilia

Weak (OR <2)

Bed rest >3 days

Immobility from sitting (car/air travel)

Increasing age

Laparoscopic surgery

Obesity

Pregnancy/antepartum

Varicose veins

Board trap: pregnancy appears in BOTH moderate (postpartum) and weak (antepartum) categories — the postpartum period carries substantially higher VTE risk than the antepartum period itself. Don't treat "pregnancy" as a single uniform risk tier.

Diagnostic Approach for DVT

Three-step framework: (1) Pretest probability → (2) D-dimer (if appropriate) → (3) Imaging.

Clinical suspicion of DVT → assess pretest probability
Low probability → D-dimer
Negative → DVT excluded
Positive → compression ultrasound
Moderate/high probability → compression ultrasound directly
Positive → DVT confirmed, start anticoagulation
Negative → D-dimer → if positive, repeat US in 7 days; if negative, DVT excluded
Wells' Criteria for DVT
CriterionPoints
Active cancer (treatment ongoing, within 6 months, or palliative)1
Calf swelling >3 cm vs. asymptomatic side (10 cm below tibial tuberosity)1
Collateral superficial veins (nonvaricose)1
Entire leg edematous1
Localized tenderness along the deep venous system1
Paralysis, paresis, or recent immobilization of lower extremity1
Pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg1
Previously documented DVT1
Recently bedridden >3 days or major surgery within 12 weeks1
Alternative diagnosis at least as likely as DVT or more likely−2
Score interpretation: Low probability: <0. Moderate: 0–2. High: >2.
Primary Care Rule Criteria (Alternative Tool)
CriterionPoints
Abnormal D-dimer assay result6
Difference in calf circumference ≥3 cm2
Absence of leg trauma1
Active cancer in past 6 months1
Distention of collateral leg veins1
Male sex assigned at birth1
Surgery in previous month1
Use of hormonal contraceptives1
Score interpretation: range 0–14; ≤3 = very low risk; ≥4 = increased risk.

D-Dimer

Board trap — calculation: a 72-year-old's age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff = 72 × 10 = 720 µg/L — well above the standard 500 threshold. Age-adjustment improves specificity in older adults and reduces unnecessary imaging without increasing missed VTE. Boards may ask you to calculate this directly.

DVT Imaging

Board trap: whole-leg ultrasound sounds "more thorough," but it's actually a trap answer in many vignettes — it risks overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant distal clots. The proximal-scan-plus-7-day-repeat strategy is the preferred, better-validated approach.

DVT Teaching Cases

Case 1 — High Pretest Probability
65F, 2-day unilateral calf pain/swelling, bedridden 5 days post-pneumonia hospitalization, calf 4cm larger, localized deep venous tenderness, pitting edema confined to leg, no alternative diagnosis as likely.
Wells score → High pretest probability → Order compression ultrasound directly (DO NOT order D-dimer first).
Case 2 — Moderate Probability, Negative US, Positive D-Dimer
62M, 3 days leg swelling/calf pain, deep venous tenderness, 10-hour car trip 1 week ago, no prior DVT/cancer/surgery.
Moderate probability → US negative → D-dimer positive → NO immediate anticoagulation → repeat compression US in 7 days to detect evolving proximal DVT. If repeat positive → anticoagulate. If repeat negative → DVT ruled out.
Case 3 — Low Risk
28F, mild intermittent calf discomfort, no swelling/redness/warmth/tenderness, no risk factors, fully ambulatory.
Low risk → D-dimer → negative D-dimer excludes DVT (no imaging needed).

Diagnostic Approach for PE

Same three-step framework: Pretest probability → D-dimer (if appropriate) → Imaging.

Clinical suspicion of PE → assess pretest probability
Low probability → apply PERC Rule → if positive, D-dimer → if positive, CTPA
Moderate probability → D-dimer directly → if positive, CTPA
High probability → CTPA directly (skip D-dimer)
Clinical Prediction Rules for PE
PE Rule-Out Criteria (PERC)Pts
Age ≥501
Heart rate ≥100 bpm1
Hemoptysis1
Hormone use (OCP, estrogen)1
O₂ saturation on room air <95%1
Prior PE or DVT1
Recent surgery or trauma ≤4 weeks1
Unilateral leg swelling1
PERC interpretation: score range 0–6; 0 = >98.5% negative predictive value for ruling out PE — if pretest probability is already low (<15%) AND all PERC criteria are negative, no further workup needed.
Wells' Criteria for PEPts
Clinical signs/symptoms of DVT3
PE is #1 diagnosis or equally likely3
Heart rate >100 bpm1.5
Immobilization ≥3 days or surgery in past 4 weeks1.5
Previous PE or DVT1.5
Hemoptysis1
Malignancy with treatment within 6 months1
Wells PE interpretation: Low: 0–1. Moderate: 2–6. High: >6. (Alternate simplified cutoff: ≤4 = "PE unlikely.")
Geneva Score (Revised)Pts
Heart rate 95+ bpm5
Heart rate 75–94 bpm3
Pain on lower limb palpation + unilateral edema4
Previous DVT or PE3
Unilateral lower limb pain3
Active malignant condition2
Hemoptysis2
Surgery or lower limb fracture in past month2
Age >65 years1
Geneva interpretation: range 0–22; <4 = low; 4–10 = moderate; ≥11 = high probability.

PE Imaging

Board trap: "PE size ≠ severity" is a favorite exam concept — a hemodynamically unstable patient with a small subsegmental clot is HIGHER risk than a stable patient with a large clot burden. Risk stratification is driven by RV strain/hemodynamics, not clot volume on imaging.

PE Teaching Cases

Case 4 — Low Risk, PERC-Negative
29M, mild non-worsening dyspnea, no risk factors, normal vitals, unremarkable exam.
Wells score 0 → low risk → apply PERC → all criteria negative → no testing indicated.
Case 5 — Moderate Risk
46F, acute dyspnea + pleuritic chest pain, on OCP, HR 104, normal BP/O2 sat.
Wells PE score 4.5 → moderate risk → D-dimer → positive → CTPA.
Case 6 — High Risk, Unstable
72M, acute SOB + lightheadedness, HR 120, BP 85/60, SpO₂ 88%, recent hip surgery, immobile, clear lungs, pale/diaphoretic.
High risk (hemodynamically unstable) → CTPA directly (skip D-dimer given high pretest probability).
Case 7 — Outpatient Disposition Question
78F, controlled DM, acute dyspnea, HR 104, BP 105/65, O₂ sat 92%, CTPA shows segmental PE, fully independent, lives with family, normal troponin/platelets/echo.
Can be considered for outpatient treatment — disposition is based on clinical stability and bleeding risk (see sPESI/CHEST criteria below); no validated DVT-specific outpatient score exists, so overall clinical judgment applies.

VTE in Pregnancy (Hypercoagulable State)

Suspected DVT in Pregnancy
  • No validated clinical prediction rules for DVT in pregnancy
  • D-dimer is unreliable — physiologically elevated throughout pregnancy
  • 1st-line test: whole-leg compression ultrasound
  • If ultrasound negative but suspicion remains: serial compression ultrasound or MR venography
Suspected PE in Pregnancy — YEARS Algorithm
  • Clinical criteria: signs of DVT, PE is most likely diagnosis, hemoptysis
  • No criteria met → PE ruled out if D-dimer <1000 ng/mL
  • ≥1 criterion met → PE ruled out if D-dimer <500 ng/mL
  • If D-dimer exceeds threshold → CTPA or V/Q scan
  • If DVT confirmed on ultrasound → treat as PE, no chest imaging needed
Treatment in pregnancy: LMWH throughout pregnancy + at least 6 weeks postpartum, with a total minimum duration of 3 months. DOACs should be avoided in pregnancy.

Risk Stratification for PE Treatment Setting (Inpatient vs. Outpatient)

1. Assess Safety of Home Management — CHEST Criteria
  • Clinically stable with good cardiopulmonary reserve
  • No recent bleeding, severe kidney/liver disease, or severe thrombocytopenia (platelets <50 × 10³/µL)
  • Patient expected to be adherent to treatment
  • Patient feels well enough to be treated at home
  • System in place for outpatient follow-up and prompt care access
Suitable for outpatient treatment only if ALL criteria are met.
2. Assess Mortality Risk — Simplified PESI
CriterionPoints
Age >80 years1
History of cancer1
History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease1
O₂ saturation <90%1
Pulse ≥110 bpm1
Systolic BP <100 mmHg1
Score of 0 = low mortality risk (1.1%) — can be considered for outpatient management if social factors allow.

Treatment Phases

1. Initial Management (5–21 days)
Goals: prevent clot extension/embolization, reduce symptoms/complications.
Risk stratify with sPESI.
DOACs first-line (apixaban, rivaroxaban) — rapid onset, no parenteral bridge needed.
Bridge required if using warfarin, dabigatran, or edoxaban.
2. Primary Treatment (3–6 months)
Purpose: clot resolution + recurrence prevention.
ACCP: 3 months; ASH: 3–6 months.
Applies to both provoked and unprovoked VTE.
Cancer-associated VTE: DOAC preferred.
3. Secondary Prevention (Extended)
Indicated for: first unprovoked VTE, recurrent VTE, VTE provoked by a chronic risk factor.
Consider thrombophilia testing (post-primary treatment) if VTE was provoked by a nonsurgical major transient risk factor, pregnancy/postpartum, or combined OCP use.
Board trap — LMWH/warfarin preference: preferred over DOACs in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and severe liver disease with coagulopathy. No routine lab monitoring is needed for DOACs.
Aspirin pearl: hold aspirin during anticoagulation if used for cardiovascular disease — no benefit to adding aspirin without another indication. However, in patients with unprovoked VTE who decline anticoagulation for secondary prevention, aspirin is suggested over no aspirin.

Anticoagulant Selection

Renal Function-Based Selection
Renal FunctionRecommendation
CrCl ≥30DOAC can be used
CrCl 15–29Avoid DOAC / adjust LMWH dose
CrCl <15 or dialysisUnfractionated heparin (UFH) + warfarin
Warfarin rules: start with heparin; overlap ≥5 days AND INR ≥2 for 24 hours before stopping the heparin bridge; target INR 2–3 for both primary treatment and secondary prevention.
Key Agents at a Glance
DrugClassKey Dosing Note
Apixaban (Eliquis)Factor Xa inhibitor10mg BID × 7 days → 5mg BID; secondary prevention 2.5mg BID; no renal adjustment needed (even on dialysis); avoid in Child-Pugh C
Rivaroxaban (Xarelto)Factor Xa inhibitor15mg BID with food × 21 days → 20mg daily with food; avoid if CrCl <15
Edoxaban (Savaysa)Factor Xa inhibitorInitiate after 5–10 days parenteral anticoagulation; dose by body weight (>60kg vs. ≤60kg)
Dabigatran (Pradaxa)Direct thrombin inhibitorInitiate after 5–10 days parenteral anticoagulation (bridge required)
Enoxaparin (LMWH)Low-molecular-weight heparin1mg/kg SC q12h or 1.5mg/kg SC q24h; dose-adjust if CrCl <30
WarfarinVitamin K antagonist5mg daily initially; no renal dose adjustment needed; overlap with heparin per rules above
Exam pearl: apixaban is unique among DOACs in requiring no dose adjustment for renal impairment, even in dialysis patients — a frequently tested distinguishing feature vs. rivaroxaban/edoxaban.

Special Considerations in VTE Treatment

SituationKey Recommendation
Acute distal DVTIf no severe symptoms/extension risk factors → consider weekly imaging × 2 weeks instead of immediate anticoagulation; treat if symptoms worsen or thrombus extends
Active cancer + acute VTEDOACs generally preferred over LMWH; consider indefinite secondary prevention
Post-thrombotic syndromeRegular physical activity is the mainstay; compression stockings not routinely recommended (though not harmful, may reduce pain/edema in some)
Subsegmental PEAnticoagulation favored if multiple imaging defects, symptomatic, markedly elevated D-dimer, or proximal DVT present; surveillance may be considered in low-recurrence-risk patients
Upper extremity DVTTreated similarly to lower extremity DVT; if provoked by a functional/necessary central venous catheter, catheter can remain in place during anticoagulation
Obesity (BMI >40)No formal guidelines, but new evidence supports safe use of rivaroxaban and apixaban after shared decision-making
Stable cardiovascular diseaseSuspend aspirin for secondary VTE prevention for the duration of anticoagulation therapy
PregnancyLMWH preferred; DOACs avoided (not tested in pregnancy); continue anticoagulation through pregnancy + at least 6 weeks postpartum (minimum total 3 months)

Take-Home Messages